Afinal, pode-se transformar o que é público em secreto?

Publicado em   23/fev/2011
por  Caio Hostilio

Mais uma vez a Assembléia Legislativa se superou hoje pela incoerência de seus membros, pois levaram o que se tornou público para uma reunião secreta. Dessa forma a  proposta pela reunião secreta ficou além da imaginação do mais criativo autor de novelas de horror.  

Rompeu-se os limites constitucionais. Esqueceu-se do sadio princípio da publicidade. Preceito fixado com rigor na Constituição da República. Avançou para os descaminhos do segredo. Excrescência inaceitável em uma democracia.

A democracia possui alguns postulados. Dentre eles, aflora a obrigação de transparência em todos os assuntos públicos. Nada pode ser secreto. Tudo deve correr às claras. A cidadania – como empregadora – tudo deve conhecer.

Nada pode ser mantido obscuramente. Só os maliciosos admitem assuntos públicos reservados. A Assembléia Legislativa, neste passo, foi além do permitido. Feriu a legislação e mostrou-se agente da improbidade.

Um erro. A democracia – o melhor dos regimes – é que permitiu o conhecimento das ações licitas e ilícitas cometidas. Em regimes autoritários ou totalitários, o pior se verifica e os aparelhos de censura a tudo escondem.

Na verdade, o deputado Raimundo Cutrim foi a tribuna cobrar da Mesa Diretora transparência nas nomeações efetuadas pela Casa e afirmar que irá denunciar às autoridades competentes os casos de nomeações em que seus detentores não comparecem ao serviço.

De acordo com a fala do deputado Cutrim, ficou transparente ao público que existem parlamentares privilegiados e outros não. Quando todos têm o mesmo direito em ter apenas 19 cargos em seus gabinetes. Para Cutrim tem que vir à tona essas ilicitudes.    

O presidente da Assembléia Legislativa, Arnaldo Melo, respondeu as denúncias da própria Mesa Diretora, ou seja, de público. Arnaldo disse que Cutrim está tentando atingir sua administração e que sua revolta é pelo fato do corte dos excessos que existiam em seu gabinete.

O presidente foi mais longe ao dizer que o deputado Cutrim esteve sentado a seu lado em uma reunião para pedir que ele mantivesse as vantagens do seu gabinete, além de dizer que o deputado Cutrim poderia tomar todas as medidas que o seu mandato lhe impõe.  

Por outro lado, Cutrim disse que na reunião apenas indagou ao presidente se ele manteria o pessoal de seu gabinete.

Como a coisa já estava pública, não haveria a necessidade de uma reunião secreta. Mesmo assim foi proposto pelo deputado Tatá Milhomem, porém o presidente Arnaldo Melo não quis tomar essa decisão monocraticamente, levando a votação para o plenário, que optou pela reunião secreta.

Em minha opinião, o plenário errou na decisão, haja vista que é direito constitucional o contribuinte saber dos atos dos poderes constituídos, além de que o fato já não era mais secreto.  

A não ser a tentativa de um cala boca ao reclamante, coisa que duvido muito, visto que o presidente pareceu ser favorável a uma discussão aberta no próprio plenário.

  Publicado em: Governo

44 Responses to Afinal, pode-se transformar o que é público em secreto?

  1. Great notions going to use these soon.

  2. Tanja Tarrats disse:

    Fun article, I surprisingly benefited from reading it, keep up all the hard efforts.

  3. Iona Vielmas disse:

    Now I’ve seen that Sixty Minutes program one can’t help but be sure Lance Armstrong is going to struggle.

  4. Thanks for this entry, honestly, can you sign up as a contributor for wikipedia because the current stuff in there for our interest is quite frankly garbage. I don’t quite agree completely with it but I agree with it on the most part and I wholeheartedly applaud your effort in putting it so ably.

  5. Mora Meyette disse:

    Fine write-up,In my opinion you could have undoubtedly started a website I must read regularly. Thank you.

  6. Thank you for the entry, seriously, can you sign up as a topic author for wikipedia because the current pages submitted there for our interest is frankly drivel. I don’t quite agree completely with it but I agree with it on the most part and I wholeheartedly applaud your effort in putting it so succinctly.

  7. Fun page, I surprisingly benefited from glossing over it, keep doing the hard work.

  8. I can’t help but think that this wedding is one of the best things to happen of the decade. Best wishes to the happy newlyweds and any body that doesn’t agree is a republican.

  9. Mercy Vascocu disse:

    Thank you for this entry, I don’t agree completely with it but I agree with it on the most part and I definitely applaud your effort in putting it so clearly.

  10. After watching that episode of 60 Minutes I would reckon Armstrong is done for.

  11. Jann Nkuku disse:

    I don’t agree with it, thanks are in order for taking the time to put it up

  12. Luanne Yaw disse:

    Enjoyable feature, I genuinely had a good time glossing over it, keep doing all the hard work.

  13. Erika Meloy disse:

    Thanks for your entry, seriously, can you sign up as a topic author for wikipedia because the current stuff hosted there for our interest is quite frankly garbage. I can’t say I agree completely with it but I agree with it on the most part and I definitely applaud your effort in putting it so clearly.

  14. Thanks for this post, honestly, can you become a topic writer for wikipedia because the current entries submitted there for our hobby is frankly garbage. I don’t agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I certainly applaud your effort in putting it so ably.

  15. Joey Bellott disse:

    Fun article, I genuinely enjoyed glossing over it, keep doing the hard work.

  16. Great post, props to you for taking the time to put it up

  17. Great ideas, many thanks for showing the initiative to throw it up

  18. Ever since the Sixty Minutes program one can’t help but think Lance Armstrong is going down.

  19. I really agree with your views.

  20. Nicki Dorrell disse:

    I def dig the sentiment!

  21. Deann Kocian disse:

    I can’t help but think that this wedding is one of the greatest things to happen of the decade. Best wishes to the happy couple and any body that doesn’t agree is a republican.

  22. Nice contribution,I do think you have surely started a web page I must read up on regularly. Thanks a lot.

  23. Briana Kohara disse:

    I really reddit this!

  24. Dean Kerper disse:

    I definitely respect the sentiment!

  25. I can’t help but think that this wedding is one of the greatest things to happen of the recent years. Best wishes to the happy couple and any body that doesn’t agree is a republican.

  26. Rosenda Hinze disse:

    Since watching that Sixty Minutes program I would be sure Lance is doing the perp walk soon.

  27. Luanne Riles disse:

    Now I’ve seen the 60 Mins show one can’t help but think Lance Armstrong is kaput.

  28. Thanks for the entry, seriously, can you sign up as a topic writer for wikipedia because the current stuff hosted there for our hobby is frankly drivel. I can’t say I agree completely with it but I agree with it on the most part and I certainly applaud your effort in putting it so clearly.

  29. Rosana Pusch disse:

    Many thanks for today’s post, seriously, can you become a topic author for wikipedia because the current entries hosted there for our interest is quite frankly dross. I don’t quite agree completely with it but I agree with it on the most part and I certainly applaud your effort in putting it so succinctly.

  30. Janita Bender disse:

    Many thanks for your post, seriously, can you become a topic writer for wikipedia because the current pages hosted there for our interest is quite frankly dross. I don’t quite agree completely with it but I agree with it on the most part and I certainly applaud your effort in putting it so ably.

  31. Bev Tritto disse:

    Thanks for the post, I don’t agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I wholeheartedly applaud your effort in putting it so succinctly.

  32. I can’t help but think that this wedding will be one of the greatest things to happen of the recent years. Congratulations to the happy newlyweds and any body that doesn’t agree is a republican.

  33. Evan Carne disse:

    I most certainly like this.

  34. Melania Youd disse:

    I definitely reddit your views!

  35. Ella Plavnik disse:

    Thanks for this entry, honestly, can you become a topic author for wikipedia because the current pages hosted there for our interest is frankly garbage. I can’t say I agree completely with it but I agree with it on the most part and I definitely applaud your effort in putting it so succinctly.

  36. Kam Arkell disse:

    Tremendous posting,I do believe you have emphatically fashioned a website I want to read routinely. Thanks a lot.

  37. I definitely respect the sentiment!

  38. Louie Luse disse:

    Fabulous piece,There’s no doubt that you’ve certainly gained a site I wish to come back to on a regular basis. Great stuff.

  39. I think that this wedding will be one of the greatest things to happen of the 2000s. The wishes of a nation to the happy newlyweds and any body that doesn’t agree is a stick in the mud.

  40. There’s no doubt that this wedding is one of the greatest things to happen of the decade. Felicitations to the happy newlyweds and any one that doesn’t agree is a killjoy.

  41. I am over the moon about it and I think that this wedding is one of the best things to happen of the 2000s. Congratulations to the happy couple and any one that doesn’t agree is a stick in the mud.

  42. Candi Reier disse:

    Lovely post, thanks to whoever thought of it and for taking the time to come up with it

  43. Leida Crisco disse:

    Marvelous posting,I do believe you have undoubtedly started a blog I want to return to more often. Thanks a lot.

  44. Incredible page,It is my opinion you’ve undeniably established a web page I must come back to repeatedly. Thank you.

Deixe uma resposta

Contatos

hostiliocaio@hotmail.com

Assine o Blog

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Publicidade

Busca no Blog